CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Trade only with money you can afford to lose.
Open an FxPro account →

This site is not Monaxa

The status of mnx-malaysia.com: a publisher, not a broker and not an adviser — what the buttons do, and where a real problem has to go.

Open an FxPro account →

Status

mnx-malaysia.com (mnx-malaysia.com) is an information website. It is not Monaxa, it is not owned or operated by Monaxa, and it has no agreement with Monaxa. It is not a broker, not a financial adviser and not a financial services provider of any kind. It holds no client money, opens no accounts, verifies no documents and processes no payments.

Nothing published here is investment advice, a recommendation, or an invitation to trade. The pages describe how an account, a client portal and a trading terminal relate to each other, and what the brand publishes about each; the decision, and the risk, stay entirely with the reader.

What the buttons on these pages do

Every account button on this site opens FxPro — a different broker, not Monaxa. The buttons say so in their own wording, and this is the one commercial arrangement behind the site: the partnership with FxPro is what funds it. There are no paid placements, no sponsored pages, and no payment from Monaxa.

Because the site's income depends on a button for a different broker, two rules are kept in writing and can be checked by reading the pages. Nothing about Monaxa is softened to make the alternative look better — the absent local licence, the figures the brand does not publish and the gaps in its public pages all stay on the page. And no page suggests that opening an account with FxPro solves a Monaxa problem; it does not, and the two are kept separate throughout.

Anyone who wants a Monaxa account opens it on the brand's own site, reached by typing its domain by hand.

Who actually holds an account

The brand and the counterparty are not the same thing, and on this brand the difference matters. The company named in the account agreement is the entity a client contracts with and the entity a dispute would be raised against. The registration and licence numbers the group publishes are printed on the home page with the date they were read; the agreement accepted at registration is where a reader finds which of them applies to their own account.

This site does not interpret that agreement, and it does not tell a reader what protection follows from it. It says where the answer is written down.

Local regulation, stated plainly

the Securities Commission Malaysia register at sc.com.my, checked on 15 September 2026 carried no entry for this brand. That is recorded as the absence of a record, which is all a register check can show — it is not a statement about the broker's conduct. What follows from that absence, and only from it, is narrow and is not softened anywhere on the site: a Malaysian client who opens an account is contracting with a company the local regulator has no record of, so the routes that depend on a local authorisation are not available. Which routes do remain is written in the client agreement, and this site does not read it for you.

Plenty of brokers operate offshore lawfully, and nothing here says otherwise. What the pages do is put the check, the date and the consequence in one place instead of leaving a reader to assume.

If something has gone wrong with an account

This site cannot help, and the reason is structural rather than a matter of policy: it has no access to any account, cannot see a balance, cannot release a withdrawal and cannot restore a login. A blocked sign-in, a stalled payout or a rejected document has to go to the broker that holds the account, through the channels that broker publishes. Which channel suits which question is set out on the customer service page, together with the one response time the brand states and what that commitment does and does not cover.

Keep the exchange in writing if the amount matters. A chat transcript that was never saved is not evidence, and the difference shows up at exactly the moment it is needed.

Risk

CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The mechanisms described across this site are the ones that turn a small mistake into a loss: leverage advertised at up to 1:2000 on low-volatility instruments (monaxa.com, read 15 September 2026), where the figure that actually applies is read in the terminal; an overnight charge whose value did not appear on the broker's public pages when they were read that day; and a payment-method check that a named third-party walkthrough describes as a separate stage. Read the broker's own documents before depositing, not only these pages, and consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.